RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

addyosmani/web-quality-skills

Default branch main · commit 95d6e255 · scanned 6/19/2026, 4:47:53 AM

GitHub: 2,391 stars · 218 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface addyosmani/web-quality-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clarify target audience for Agent Skills

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An (unofficial) comprehensive collection of Agent Skills for optimizing web projects based on Google Lighthouse guidelines and Core Web Vitals best practices.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An (unofficial) comprehensive collection of Agent Skills **designed for developers building or training AI assistants** to optimize web projects based on Google Lighthouse guidelines and Core Web Vitals best practices.
  • mediumabout#2
    Update About description to specify target audience

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Agent Skills for optimizing web quality based on Lighthouse and Core Web Vitals.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Agent Skills **for developers building AI assistants** to optimize web quality based on Lighthouse and Core Web Vitals.
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a comparison section to README to differentiate from web quality tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Relationship to Web Quality Tools
This repository is not a direct alternative to web quality analysis tools like Google Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights, WebPageTest, or Deque axe DevTools. Instead, it provides the underlying *skills, knowledge, and structured prompts* that an AI assistant needs to effectively *interpret* the output of such tools and generate actionable, context-aware optimization advice. Think of it as the 'brain' or 'curriculum' for an AI agent focused on web quality, rather than the diagnostic tool itself.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface addyosmani/web-quality-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Lighthouse
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Lighthouse · recommended 1×
  2. Siteimprove · recommended 1×
  3. Deque axe DevTools · recommended 1×
  4. UserWay AI Accessibility Widget · recommended 1×
  5. Dynatrace · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use an AI assistant to improve my website's performance and accessibility?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Lighthouse
    2. Siteimprove
    3. Deque axe DevTools
    4. UserWay AI Accessibility Widget
    5. Dynatrace
    6. New Relic
    7. Clerk.io
    8. Nosto
    9. ChatGPT
    10. Google Gemini
    11. Claude

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named addyosmani/web-quality-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools provide actionable advice for optimizing Core Web Vitals and Lighthouse scores?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PageSpeed Insights
    2. Lighthouse
    3. WebPageTest
    4. Google Search Console
    5. GTmetrix
    6. SpeedVitals

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named addyosmani/web-quality-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of addyosmani/web-quality-skills?
    pass
    AI named addyosmani/web-quality-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts addyosmani/web-quality-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named addyosmani/web-quality-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo addyosmani/web-quality-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name addyosmani/web-quality-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of addyosmani/web-quality-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/addyosmani/web-quality-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/addyosmani/web-quality-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/addyosmani/web-quality-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/addyosmani/web-quality-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

addyosmani/web-quality-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite