RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

openclaw/clawsweeper

Default branch main · commit 22d91122 · scanned 5/11/2026, 12:12:11 AM

GitHub: 1,598 stars · 205 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface openclaw/clawsweeper, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clarify its core purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ClawSweeper is the conservative maintenance bot for OpenClaw repositories.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ClawSweeper is a conservative GitHub repository maintenance bot that automatically reviews and manages stale issues and pull requests, keeping backlogs tidy.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics for GitHub repository maintenance

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, bot, openclaw, review
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, bot, openclaw, review, github-bot, stale-issues, pr-cleanup, backlog-management, repository-maintenance
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a section comparing ClawSweeper to common alternatives

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why ClawSweeper? How it differs from other tools

Unlike generic stale bots (e.g., actions/stale) or broad automation platforms (e.g., Probot), ClawSweeper focuses on conservative, durable backlog review and maintainer-guided repair, rather than aggressive auto-closing or simple rule-based actions. It provides a single, editable review comment per item and supports advanced features like bounded Codex review/fix loops.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface openclaw/clawsweeper
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Actions
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Actions · recommended 1×
  2. actions/stale · recommended 1×
  3. Probot · recommended 1×
  4. Stale app · recommended 1×
  5. Dependabot · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate stale issue and pull request cleanup in my GitHub repository?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Actions
    2. actions/stale (actions/stale)
    3. Probot
    4. Stale app
    5. Dependabot
    6. GitHub API
    7. Python
    8. PyGithub
    9. Node.js
    10. @octokit/rest
    11. Zapier
    12. IFTTT

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named openclaw/clawsweeper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help with continuous backlog review and automated GitHub comment management?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Linear
    2. Jira Software
    3. ZenHub
    4. GitHub Projects
    5. Axolo
    6. Monday.com
    7. ClickUp

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named openclaw/clawsweeper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of openclaw/clawsweeper?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/clawsweeper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts openclaw/clawsweeper in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/clawsweeper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo openclaw/clawsweeper solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named openclaw/clawsweeper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of openclaw/clawsweeper. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/openclaw/clawsweeper.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/openclaw/clawsweeper)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/openclaw/clawsweeper"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/openclaw/clawsweeper.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

openclaw/clawsweeper — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite