RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

cursor/agent-trace

Default branch main · commit 2754f077 · scanned 6/1/2026, 8:38:33 AM

GitHub: 732 stars · 53 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface cursor/agent-trace, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening paragraph to clarify its role as a specification

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Agent Trace is an open specification for tracing AI-generated code. It provides a vendor-neutral format for recording AI contributions alongside human authorship in version-controlled codebases.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Agent Trace is an open specification for tracing AI-generated code, providing a vendor-neutral format for recording AI contributions alongside human authorship in version-controlled codebases. Unlike proprietary tools or general version control systems, Agent Trace focuses on an interoperable standard for transparent attribution, crucial for understanding and managing AI-generated content.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, or GPL-3.0) that best suits the project's goals.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface cursor/agent-trace
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  2. GitHub Actions · recommended 1×
  3. GitLab CI/CD · recommended 1×
  4. Gerrit · recommended 1×
  5. CodeWhisperer · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to track AI-generated code contributions within a version control system?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Actions
    2. GitLab CI/CD
    3. Gerrit
    4. CodeWhisperer
    5. GitHub Copilot
    6. JSDoc
    7. PyDoc
    8. JavaDoc
    9. Conventional Commits

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named cursor/agent-trace. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a standardized way to attribute code authorship between humans and AI agents.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Git
    2. SPDX
    3. GitHub Copilot
    4. OpenAI
    5. GPT-4

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named cursor/agent-trace. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of cursor/agent-trace?
    pass
    AI named cursor/agent-trace explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts cursor/agent-trace in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named cursor/agent-trace explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo cursor/agent-trace solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named cursor/agent-trace explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of cursor/agent-trace. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/cursor/agent-trace.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/cursor/agent-trace)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/cursor/agent-trace"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/cursor/agent-trace.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

cursor/agent-trace — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite