RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

apkclaw-team/ApkClaw

Default branch main · commit 1b8d40fa · scanned 6/8/2026, 10:36:44 PM

GitHub: 733 stars · 133 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface apkclaw-team/ApkClaw, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An AI-powered Android automation app that lets an LLM Agent control Android devices (phones) via natural language through messaging channels.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics for categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    android-automation, ai-agent, llm, natural-language, remote-control, chat-bot, android-control, mobile-automation
  • mediumreadme#3
    Reposition the README's first sentence to clarify its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An AI-powered Android automation app that lets an LLM Agent control Android devices (phones) via natural language.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ApkClaw is an AI-powered Android automation *agent* for live device control via natural language, not static analysis. It enables an LLM to autonomously operate Android phones through messaging channels like Discord and Telegram.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface apkclaw-team/ApkClaw
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Tasker
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Tasker · recommended 2×
  2. AutoInput · recommended 2×
  3. AutoVoice · recommended 2×
  4. Appium · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate Android device operations using natural language and AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Appium
    2. OpenAI GPT-4
    3. Claude 3
    4. LangChain
    5. LlamaIndex
    6. Google Gemini
    7. Android Studio
    8. UI Automator
    9. OpenAI GPT-3.5/4
    10. Mistral
    11. Tasker
    12. AutoInput
    13. AutoVoice
    14. OpenAI GPT
    15. Hugging Face Inference API
    16. Robot Framework
    17. AppiumLibrary
    18. Cohere
    19. OpenCV
    20. YOLO
    21. OpenAI GPT-4V
    22. Llava

    AI recommended 22 alternatives but never named apkclaw-team/ApkClaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a tool to control Android phones remotely via chat applications with AI commands.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Tasker
    2. AutoRemote
    3. AutoInput
    4. AutoVoice
    5. Join by joaoapps
    6. Unified Remote
    7. TeamViewer Host
    8. AirDroid
    9. Pushbullet

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named apkclaw-team/ApkClaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of apkclaw-team/ApkClaw?
    pass
    AI named apkclaw-team/ApkClaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts apkclaw-team/ApkClaw in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named apkclaw-team/ApkClaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo apkclaw-team/ApkClaw solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named apkclaw-team/ApkClaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of apkclaw-team/ApkClaw. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/apkclaw-team/ApkClaw.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/apkclaw-team/ApkClaw)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/apkclaw-team/ApkClaw"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/apkclaw-team/ApkClaw.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

apkclaw-team/ApkClaw — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite