RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NousResearch/autonovel

Default branch master · commit d165f267 · scanned 6/27/2026, 7:22:53 AM

GitHub: 1,206 stars · 242 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NousResearch/autonovel, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, llm-pipeline, novel-writing, generative-ai, autonomous-ai, creative-writing, agentic-workflow, ai-research
  • highlicense#2
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0). If a custom license is intended, add a clear statement to the README, e.g., 'This project is licensed under [License Name/Description]. See [link to details] for more information.'
  • mediumreadme#3
    Refine the README's opening sentence for clearer positioning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # autonovel

An autonomous pipeline for writing, revising, typesetting, illustrating, and narrating a complete novel. From a seed concept to a print-ready PDF, ePub, audiobook, and landing page — all generated by AI agents.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # autonovel

An autonomous, multi-agent research pipeline and framework for generating, revising, typesetting, illustrating, and narrating complete novels from a seed concept, producing print-ready PDFs, ePubs, audiobooks, and landing pages via AI agents.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NousResearch/autonovel
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  2. Claude · recommended 1×
  3. Google Gemini · recommended 1×
  4. Sudowrite · recommended 1×
  5. Jasper · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to write a full-length novel from a concept?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Claude
    3. Google Gemini
    4. Sudowrite
    5. Jasper
    6. NovelAI
    7. Grammarly
    8. ProWritingAid

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named NousResearch/autonovel. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for an AI-driven pipeline to generate, revise, and publish a complete book?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API (GPT-4 / GPT-3.5 Turbo)
    2. Anthropic Claude (Opus / Sonnet)
    3. LangChain
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. Google Gemini API (Gemini 1.5 Pro)
    6. Hugging Face Transformers
    7. Diffusers
    8. Pandoc
    9. Git
    10. GitHub
    11. GitLab

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named NousResearch/autonovel. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NousResearch/autonovel?
    pass
    AI named NousResearch/autonovel explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NousResearch/autonovel in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NousResearch/autonovel explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NousResearch/autonovel solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named NousResearch/autonovel explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NousResearch/autonovel. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NousResearch/autonovel.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NousResearch/autonovel)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NousResearch/autonovel"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NousResearch/autonovel.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NousResearch/autonovel — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite