RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

telekom-security/tpotce

Default branch master · commit 98e9d6bd · scanned 5/24/2026, 9:11:14 PM

GitHub: 9,233 stars · 1,370 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface telekom-security/tpotce, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highhomepage#1
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the homepage URL to the official project website (e.g., `https://tpotce.github.io/` if applicable, or another official site).
  • highreadme#2
    Explicitly state this is the official T-Pot CE repository in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a sentence near the top of the README, e.g., 'This is the official `telekom-security/tpotce` repository for the T-Pot Community Edition.'
  • mediumreadme#3
    Integrate 'threat intelligence' and 'security researchers' into the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    T-Pot is the all in one, optionally distributed, multiarch (amd64, arm64) honeypot plattform, supporting 20+ honeypots and countless visualization options using the Elastic Stack, animated live attack maps and lots of security tools to further improve the deception experience.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    T-Pot is the all-in-one, optionally distributed, multiarch (amd64, arm64) honeypot platform, designed for security researchers and network defenders to collect and analyze threat intelligence. It supports 20+ honeypots and countless visualization options using the Elastic Stack, animated live attack maps, and lots of security tools to further improve the deception experience.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface telekom-security/tpotce
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Splunk
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Splunk · recommended 2×
  2. dtag-dev-sec/tpotce · recommended 1×
  3. honeynet/honeypi · recommended 1×
  4. threatstream/mhn · recommended 1×
  5. thinkst/opencanary · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to set up an all-in-one platform for deploying multiple honeypots to detect network threats?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. T-Pot (dtag-dev-sec/tpotce)
    2. Honeynet Project's HoneyPi (honeynet/honeypi)
    3. Modern Honey Network (MHN) (threatstream/mhn)
    4. OpenCanary (thinkst/opencanary)
    5. Docker
    6. Kubernetes (kubernetes/kubernetes)
    7. Docker Compose (docker/compose)
    8. ELK Stack
    9. Splunk
    10. Grafana (grafana/grafana)
    11. Prometheus (prometheus/prometheus)

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named telekom-security/tpotce. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source tools provide comprehensive attack visualization and analysis for a deception environment?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elasticsearch
    2. Logstash
    3. Kibana
    4. Splunk
    5. Grafana
    6. Prometheus
    7. Loki
    8. Security Onion
    9. Malcolm
    10. OpenCTI

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named telekom-security/tpotce. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of telekom-security/tpotce?
    pass
    AI named telekom-security/tpotce explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts telekom-security/tpotce in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named telekom-security/tpotce explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo telekom-security/tpotce solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named telekom-security/tpotce explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of telekom-security/tpotce. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/telekom-security/tpotce.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/telekom-security/tpotce)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/telekom-security/tpotce"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/telekom-security/tpotce.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

telekom-security/tpotce — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite