RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

rush86999/atom

Default branch main · commit 8b0c4354 · scanned 6/8/2026, 6:17:00 AM

GitHub: 760 stars · 77 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface rush86999/atom, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a prominent disambiguation note to the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <div align="center">

# ATOM Platform
### Open-Source AI Agent Platform for Self-Hosted Automation
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <div align="center">

# ATOM Platform
### Open-Source AI Agent Platform for Self-Hosted Automation

**NOTE: This repository is for the ATOM AI Agent Platform, NOT the Atom text editor.**
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a project homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://atom.agent-platform.dev
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with broader AI agent platform keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agentic-workflow, ai, ai-agent, calendar, finance, gdrive, gmail, google-calendar, notion, productivity, scheduler, shopify, slack, tasks, zoho, zoom
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agentic-workflow, ai, ai-agent, llm-agents, multi-agent-system, workflow-automation, business-automation, self-hosted, calendar, finance, gdrive, gmail, google-calendar, notion, productivity, scheduler, shopify, slack, tasks, zoho, zoom

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface rush86999/atom
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. Haystack · recommended 2×
  3. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  4. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  5. AutoGPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an open-source, self-hosted AI agent to automate business workflows securely.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. AutoGPT
    3. AgentGPT
    4. SuperAGI
    5. Haystack
    6. Open Interpreter
    7. CrewAI
    8. LlamaIndex
    9. BabyAGI

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named rush86999/atom. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I set up an intelligent multi-agent system for task automation using natural language?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. OpenAI GPT-4o
    3. GPT-4 Turbo
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. Anthropic Claude 3 Opus
    6. AutoGen
    7. Microsoft Azure OpenAI Service
    8. CrewAI
    9. Haystack
    10. Cohere Command R+
    11. Google Gemini Advanced
    12. Gemini 1.5 Pro

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named rush86999/atom. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of rush86999/atom?
    pass
    AI named rush86999/atom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts rush86999/atom in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named rush86999/atom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo rush86999/atom solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named rush86999/atom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of rush86999/atom. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/rush86999/atom.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/rush86999/atom)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/rush86999/atom"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/rush86999/atom.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

rush86999/atom — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite