REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
nlpai-lab/KULLM
Default branch main · commit 2de1d301 · scanned 5/29/2026, 11:52:41 PM
GitHub: 586 stars · 71 forks
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface nlpai-lab/KULLM, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- hightopics#1Add relevant topics to the repository
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXkorean-llm, large-language-model, llm, nlp, korean-nlp, instruction-tuning, polyglot-ko, deep-learning, machine-learning, korea-university
- mediumreadme#2Strengthen the README's opening statement for clarity and differentiation
Why:
CURRENTKULLM(구름)은 고려대학교 NLP & AI 연구실과 HIAI 연구소가 개발한 한국어 Large Language Model (LLM) 입니다.
COPY-PASTE FIXKULLM(구름)은 고려대학교 NLP & AI 연구실과 HIAI 연구소가 개발한, 한국어에 특화된 오픈소스 대규모 언어 모델(LLM)입니다. 특히, 한국어 지시를 따르도록 미세 조정되어 다양한 한국어 NLP 작업에 최적화되어 있습니다.
- lowreadme#3Add a 'Why KULLM?' or 'Comparison' section to the README
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX## Why KULLM? (왜 구름인가요?) [Add content here explaining KULLM's unique strengths, e.g., open-source nature, specific instruction-tuning, performance benchmarks, or comparison to other Korean LLMs like KoGPT or Polyglot-Ko.]
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- HyperCLOVA X · recommended 1×
- GPT-4 · recommended 1×
- GPT-3.5 Turbo · recommended 1×
- CLOVA X · recommended 1×
- KoGPT · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat are the best large language models optimized for Korean language tasks?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- HyperCLOVA X
- GPT-4
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- CLOVA X
- KoGPT
- Polyglot-Ko
- Llama 2
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named nlpai-lab/KULLM. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYSeeking an open-source large language model for high-performance Korean text generation.you: #5AI recommended (in order):
- Polyglot-Ko (EleutherAI/Polyglot-Ko)
- KoGPT (KakaoBrain/kogpt)
- Llama 2 (Meta/Llama-2-7b-chat-hf)
- SOLAR (Upstage/SOLAR-10.7B-v1.0)
- KULLM (nlpai-lab/kullm-v2) ← you
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of nlpai-lab/KULLM?passAI named nlpai-lab/KULLM explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts nlpai-lab/KULLM in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named nlpai-lab/KULLM explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo nlpai-lab/KULLM solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI named nlpai-lab/KULLM explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of nlpai-lab/KULLM. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/nlpai-lab/KULLM)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/nlpai-lab/KULLM"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/nlpai-lab/KULLM.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
nlpai-lab/KULLM — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite