RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents

Default branch main · commit 0da290a4 · scanned 5/13/2026, 12:57:57 AM

GitHub: 1,377 stars · 359 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Align README resource count with description and emphasize "awesome list" nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This project tracks the latest agentic AI projects and provides a list of 200+ resources, curated by Slava Kurilyak
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This is the most comprehensive and actively curated awesome list of 300+ agentic AI projects, frameworks, research, and tools, designed to help you navigate the rapidly evolving AI agent landscape.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents
  • mediumreadme#3
    Reframe the 'Wait But Why' section to explain the value of this list

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **Wait But Why**

AI agents outperform traditional LLMs

According to Andrew Ng (@andrewyng):

> "GPT-3.5 with an agentic workflow actually outperforms GPT-4"
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Wait But Why This List?**

The field of AI agents is exploding, with new projects and research emerging daily. Navigating this rapid evolution to find reliable resources, cutting-edge frameworks, or foundational research can be overwhelming. This list solves that by providing a single, curated source.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LlamaIndex
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  2. LangChain · recommended 2×
  3. Awesome-AGI · recommended 1×
  4. AI Agent List · recommended 1×
  5. Hugging Face · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive list of agentic AI projects and resources?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Awesome-AGI
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. LangChain
    4. AI Agent List
    5. Hugging Face
    6. Papers With Code
    7. Future of Life Institute (FLI)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the top frameworks for building and evaluating autonomous AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. AutoGPT
    4. CrewAI
    5. Haystack
    6. Microsoft AutoGen
    7. OpenAI Assistants API

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents?
    pass
    AI did not name slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite