RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines

Default branch main · commit 3e97bab6 · scanned 6/4/2026, 7:02:59 PM

GitHub: 746 stars · 26 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening to emphasize AI code generation guidelines

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Modern Go Guidelines

This repository contains guidelines for code agents that help them write modern Go code.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Modern Go Guidelines for AI Code Generation

This repository contains guidelines specifically designed for AI code agents (LLMs) to help them write modern, idiomatic Go code.
  • highabout#2
    Add a concise description to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Guidelines for AI code agents (LLMs) to generate modern, idiomatic Go code, covering features from Go 1.0 through 1.26.
  • hightopics#3
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    go, golang, ai-code-generation, llm, code-guidelines, modern-go, best-practices, jetbrains

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GoLand's AI Assistant
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GoLand's AI Assistant · recommended 1×
  2. Custom GPTs · recommended 1×
  3. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  4. Copilot Chat · recommended 1×
  5. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to ensure AI code generation adheres to modern Go language features?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GoLand's AI Assistant
    2. Custom GPTs
    3. GitHub Copilot
    4. Copilot Chat
    5. ChatGPT
    6. Claude
    7. Gemini
    8. golangci-lint
    9. gofmt
    10. goimports
    11. staticcheck
    12. errcheck
    13. unparam
    14. prealloc
    15. nakedret
    16. ireturn
    17. gopls
    18. go vet
    19. Tabnine
    20. Sourcegraph Cody

    AI recommended 20 alternatives but never named JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What resources help update existing Go codebases to use current language idioms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Go official documentation and blog
    2. `go fix`
    3. `go vet`
    4. Effective Go
    5. Go Code Review Comments
    6. "Go in Action"
    7. "The Go Programming Language"
    8. `golangci-lint` (golangci/golangci-lint)
    9. Go subreddit
    10. Gophers Slack

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines?
    pass
    AI did not name JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

JetBrains/go-modern-guidelines — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite