RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction

Default branch main · commit 30951392 · scanned 6/20/2026, 1:57:41 AM

GitHub: 544 stars · 29 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AudioInteraction is the first unified, general streaming audio language model, capable of real-time interaction and instruction following for both offline and streaming audio tasks like ASR, S2TT, and voice chatting.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a LICENSE file (e.g., Apache-2.0 or MIT) to the repository root, or explicitly state the intended license(s) in the README.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Cloud Dialogflow CX
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Cloud Dialogflow CX · recommended 1×
  2. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text · recommended 1×
  3. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech · recommended 1×
  4. AWS Lex V2 · recommended 1×
  5. Amazon Transcribe · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a real-time conversational AI model for live audio stream processing and interaction.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Cloud Dialogflow CX
    2. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
    3. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
    4. AWS Lex V2
    5. Amazon Transcribe
    6. Amazon Polly
    7. Microsoft Azure Bot Service
    8. Azure Cognitive Services Speech
    9. Rasa Open Source (RasaHQ/rasa)
    10. Kaldi
    11. VosK
    12. MaryTTS
    13. Mozilla TTS
    14. NVIDIA Riva
    15. OpenAI API
    16. Whisper
    17. GPT-4
    18. GPT-3.5
    19. OpenAI Text-to-Speech API

    AI recommended 19 alternatives but never named xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are unified models for both offline and streaming audio tasks like ASR and S2TT?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Whisper (openai/whisper)
    2. Conformer
    3. RNN-T
    4. Wav2Vec 2.0 (facebookresearch/fairseq)
    5. SpeechBrain (speechbrain/speechbrain)
    6. ESPnet (espnet/espnet)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction?
    pass
    AI named xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
xzf-thu/Audio-Interaction — RepoGEO report