RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

rohitg00/awesome-openclaw

Default branch main · commit 340e2bbf · scanned 6/10/2026, 9:02:47 AM

GitHub: 517 stars · 128 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface rohitg00/awesome-openclaw, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    The most comprehensive, curated collection of OpenClaw resources, hosting guides, cost comparisons, security hardening, skills, tutorials, and community links.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome-list, awesome, openclaw, resources, guides, tutorials, community
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository root

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the appropriate license text for this 'awesome list' project. The README links to a license for the main OpenClaw project, but this repository needs its own explicit license file.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface rohitg00/awesome-openclaw
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub
Recommended in 3 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub · recommended 3×
  2. GitLab · recommended 1×
  3. readthedocs/readthedocs.org · recommended 1×
  4. discourse/discourse · recommended 1×
  5. zulip/zulip · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive collection of resources for a rapidly growing open-source project?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub
    2. GitLab
    3. Read the Docs (readthedocs/readthedocs.org)
    4. Discourse (discourse/discourse)
    5. Zulip (zulip/zulip)
    6. Open Collective (opencollective/opencollective)
    7. Netlify

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named rohitg00/awesome-openclaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best curated lists of tools and guides for popular new developer platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub
    2. Dev.to
    3. Hashnode
    4. GitHub
    5. Product Hunt
    6. Smashing Magazine
    7. FreeCodeCamp

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named rohitg00/awesome-openclaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of rohitg00/awesome-openclaw?
    pass
    AI did not name rohitg00/awesome-openclaw — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts rohitg00/awesome-openclaw in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named rohitg00/awesome-openclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo rohitg00/awesome-openclaw solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name rohitg00/awesome-openclaw — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of rohitg00/awesome-openclaw. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/rohitg00/awesome-openclaw.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/rohitg00/awesome-openclaw)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/rohitg00/awesome-openclaw"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/rohitg00/awesome-openclaw.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

rohitg00/awesome-openclaw — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite