RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code

Default branch main · commit 515437b4 · scanned 6/29/2026, 4:16:16 AM

GitHub: 1,153 stars · 161 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Insert a direct statement of Zoo Code's core function at the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts with the main title and tagline, then immediately dives into the 'Roo team winding down' announcement under '## We are Zoo Code'.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Insert this paragraph immediately after the tagline `> Your AI-Powered Dev Team, Right in Your Editor` and before the `## We are Zoo Code` section:
    
    `Zoo Code is an AI-powered dev team, integrated directly into your code editor, designed to assist with coding, automate tasks, and generate code. It empowers developers by bringing a full suite of AI agents right into their workflow.`
  • mediumreadme#2
    Rephrase the 'We are Zoo Code' section to clearly position Zoo Code as a successor to Roo Code

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current text under '## We are Zoo Code' starts with: `You may have seen the recent announcement from the Roo team...`
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Replace the content under `## We are Zoo Code` with:
    
    `Zoo Code proudly continues the vision of the Roo Code project, evolving the beloved AI-powered dev team experience for its dedicated community. We are committed to active development, ensuring this powerful plugin remains a vital tool for developers.`
    
    (Then, the details about the Roo team winding down can follow this introductory statement, perhaps in a sub-section or a later paragraph.)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  2. Tabnine · recommended 2×
  3. Cursor · recommended 1×
  4. Codeium · recommended 1×
  5. Amazon CodeWhisperer · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I get AI agents to assist with coding directly within my IDE?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Cursor
    3. Codeium
    4. Tabnine
    5. Amazon CodeWhisperer
    6. JetBrains AI Assistant
    7. Continue

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI tool to automate common development tasks and generate code.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. CodeWhisperer
    4. Google Gemini
    5. CodiumAI
    6. ChatGPT
    7. Replit AI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code?
    pass
    AI named Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite