RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bytedance/pasa

Default branch main · commit 2aaa6a9b · scanned 5/20/2026, 7:03:03 PM

GitHub: 1,571 stars · 114 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bytedance/pasa, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Refine the 'About' description for clarity and keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    PaSa -- an advanced paper search agent powered by large language models. It can autonomously make a series of decisions, including invoking search tools, reading papers, and selecting relevant references, to ultimately obtain comprehensive and accurate results for complex scholarly queries.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    PaSa: An advanced LLM agent for comprehensive academic paper search. It autonomously finds, reads, and references scholarly articles to answer complex research queries.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific, descriptive topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    research
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm-agent, paper-search, academic-research, large-language-models, ai-agent, scholarly-search, literature-review
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the project homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://pasa-agent.ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface bytedance/pasa
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 2×
  2. ResearchRabbit · recommended 2×
  3. Connected Papers · recommended 2×
  4. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  5. Scite.ai · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate finding and summarizing relevant academic papers for my research?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. ResearchRabbit
    3. Connected Papers
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. Scite.ai
    6. ChatGPT
    7. Zotero

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named bytedance/pasa. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools help researchers navigate vast academic literature and answer complex questions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Semantic Scholar
    3. Connected Papers
    4. Scite.ai
    5. ResearchRabbit
    6. Iris.ai
    7. ChatGPT

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named bytedance/pasa. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bytedance/pasa?
    pass
    AI named bytedance/pasa explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bytedance/pasa in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bytedance/pasa explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bytedance/pasa solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named bytedance/pasa explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bytedance/pasa. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bytedance/pasa.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bytedance/pasa)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bytedance/pasa"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bytedance/pasa.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bytedance/pasa — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
bytedance/pasa — RepoGEO report