RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

xlang-ai/OSWorld

Default branch main · commit 51a35b73 · scanned 5/19/2026, 6:42:00 PM

GitHub: 2,857 stars · 461 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface xlang-ai/OSWorld, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening statement to highlight core differentiator

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README excerpt starts with links and badges, followed by an 'Updates' section, burying the value proposition.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    OSWorld is a cutting-edge benchmark for evaluating multimodal AI agents on open-ended tasks within *real* computer environments, distinguishing it from simulated or web-only benchmarks. It provides a robust framework for assessing LLM agents on complex GUI and CLI interactions.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why OSWorld? (vs. Alternatives)
    OSWorld stands apart from other benchmarks by focusing on **real computer environments** rather than simulated or web-based interactions. While tools like MiniWoB++ and ALFWorld offer valuable insights in controlled simulations, and Playwright/Selenium excel in web automation, OSWorld provides a unique platform for evaluating agents on full-fledged operating system tasks, including complex GUI and CLI interactions, within a secure and reproducible Dockerized setup. This allows for a more realistic assessment of an agent's ability to generalize and perform in diverse, open-ended scenarios.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Key Features' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Key Features
    *   **Real Computer Environments:** Evaluate agents directly within actual operating systems (GUI & CLI) via Docker.
    *   **Multimodal Agent Benchmarking:** Designed for comprehensive assessment of agents utilizing various input modalities.
    *   **Open-Ended Task Evaluation:** Tackle complex, multi-step tasks that require reasoning and interaction beyond simple API calls.
    *   **Reproducible & Scalable:** Leverage Docker for consistent environments and AWS support for parallelized evaluation.
    *   **Comprehensive Data & Metrics:** Access a rich dataset of tasks and detailed evaluation metrics.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface xlang-ai/OSWorld
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AgentBench
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AgentBench · recommended 2×
  2. MiniWoB++ · recommended 2×
  3. Playwright · recommended 2×
  4. Selenium · recommended 2×
  5. AutoGPT · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to benchmark multimodal AI agents performing open-ended tasks in real computer environments?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AgentBench
    2. MiniWoB++
    3. ALFWorld
    4. ProcTHOR
    5. Playwright
    6. Selenium
    7. AutoGPT
    8. BabyAGI
    9. Docker

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named xlang-ai/OSWorld. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks exist for evaluating large language model agents on GUI and CLI interactions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AgentBench
    2. SWE-bench
    3. MiniWoB++
    4. Playwright
    5. Selenium
    6. AutoGPT
    7. BabyAGI
    8. OpenAI Gym
    9. LangChain
    10. LlamaIndex

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named xlang-ai/OSWorld. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of xlang-ai/OSWorld?
    pass
    AI named xlang-ai/OSWorld explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts xlang-ai/OSWorld in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named xlang-ai/OSWorld explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo xlang-ai/OSWorld solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named xlang-ai/OSWorld explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of xlang-ai/OSWorld. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/xlang-ai/OSWorld.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/xlang-ai/OSWorld)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/xlang-ai/OSWorld"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/xlang-ai/OSWorld.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

xlang-ai/OSWorld — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite