RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file

Default branch master · commit 77727c0d · scanned 5/21/2026, 10:07:08 PM

GitHub: 2,635 stars · 280 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to highlight 'self-hosted solution with management and monitoring'

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # tl-rtc-file-tool (tl webrtc file(media) tools)
    
    This is a comprehensive, self-hosted WebRTC P2P solution for online file and media streaming, offering robust management and statistical monitoring features.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add specific topics for 'self-hosted', 'monitoring', and 'streaming solution'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    demotool, filetransfer, node, p2p, turnserver, webrtc, websocket
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    demotool, filetransfer, node, p2p, turnserver, webrtc, websocket, self-hosted, monitoring, streaming-solution, webrtc-solution, p2p-tool
  • lowreadme#3
    Enhance 'Advantages' section to emphasize 'out-of-the-box' and 'comprehensive' features

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Within the 'Advantages' section, add text emphasizing that tl-rtc-file provides a comprehensive, out-of-the-box solution, unlike many simpler libraries or components that require extensive custom development for similar functionality.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
peerjs/peerjs
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. peerjs/peerjs · recommended 1×
  2. feross/simple-peer · recommended 1×
  3. webtorrent/webtorrent · recommended 1×
  4. socketio/socket.io · recommended 1×
  5. expressjs/express · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to implement a web-based P2P file and media streaming solution?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PeerJS (peerjs/peerjs)
    2. SimplePeer (feross/simple-peer)
    3. WebTorrent (webtorrent/webtorrent)
    4. Socket.IO (socketio/socket.io)
    5. Express.js (expressjs/express)
    6. Node.js (nodejs/node)
    7. MediaStream Recording API
    8. FFmpeg.wasm (ffmpegwasm/ffmpeg.wasm)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a self-hosted solution for WebRTC P2P file transfers with monitoring features.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PeerTube (framasoft/peertube)
    2. FilePizza (kern/filepizza)
    3. SimpleWebRTC (simplewebrtc/simplewebrtc)
    4. Kurento Media Server (kurento/kurento-media-server)
    5. Mediasoup (versatica/mediasoup)
    6. P2P.chat (p2p-chat/p2p.chat)
    7. WebTorrent Desktop (webtorrent/webtorrent-desktop)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file?
    pass
    AI named tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

tl-open-source/tl-rtc-file — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite