RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/apm

Default branch main · commit a4957b91 · scanned 5/19/2026, 2:06:30 PM

GitHub: 2,421 stars · 180 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/apm, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening paragraph to clarify the full name and purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # APM – Agent Package Manager

**An open-source, community-driven dependency manager for AI agents.**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # APM (Agent Package Manager)

**APM is an open-source, community-driven dependency manager specifically for AI agents.**
  • highabout#2
    Update the repository description to be more explicit about AI agents

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Agent Package Manager
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A dependency manager for AI agents (prompts, skills, plugins, context).
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, e.g., `## Comparison to other tools` or `## Why not X, Y, Z?` that clarifies how APM differs from generic configuration managers (like Hydra, DVC) or model/code hubs (like Hugging Face Hub, GitHub). Focus on its unique role as a *dependency manager for AI agent components*.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface microsoft/apm
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
MLflow
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. MLflow · recommended 1×
  2. Hydra · recommended 1×
  3. DVC · recommended 1×
  4. ConfigArgParse · recommended 1×
  5. Pydantic Settings · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to manage and reproduce AI agent configurations across different development environments?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MLflow
    2. Hydra
    3. DVC
    4. ConfigArgParse
    5. Pydantic Settings
    6. Kubernetes ConfigMaps/Secrets

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named microsoft/apm. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What's a good dependency manager for sharing AI agent prompts, skills, and plugins?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub
    2. GitLab
    3. Bitbucket
    4. Git LFS
    5. Hugging Face Hub
    6. PyPI
    7. npm
    8. Yarn
    9. Docker Hub
    10. Google Container Registry
    11. AWS ECR
    12. LangChain Hub
    13. JFrog Artifactory
    14. Sonatype Nexus

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named microsoft/apm. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/apm?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/apm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/apm in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/apm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/apm solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/apm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/apm. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/apm.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/apm)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/apm"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/apm.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/apm — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite