RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent

Default branch main · commit 2c190042 · scanned 5/23/2026, 5:58:04 AM

GitHub: 6,750 stars · 750 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clearly state AppAgent's purpose and unique approach

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # [CHI 2025] AppAgent
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # AppAgent: Multimodal LLM Agent for Smartphone Control
    
    AppAgent is an LLM-based multimodal agent framework designed to operate any smartphone application by visually perceiving the screen and generating human-like actions (taps, swipes, text input), without requiring app-specific APIs or accessibility trees. This project enables advanced AI automation for mobile tasks.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand topics to include specific mobile automation and GUI agent keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, chatgpt, generative-ai, gpt4, gpt4v, llm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, chatgpt, generative-ai, gpt4, gpt4v, llm, mobile-automation, gui-agent, smartphone-control, multimodal-agent, visual-perception
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a dedicated 'Why AppAgent?' or 'Key Differentiators' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, for example, `## Why AppAgent?` or `## Key Differentiators`, that explicitly states how AppAgent differs from traditional mobile automation frameworks (e.g., Appium, UI Automator) by using visual perception and LLMs to control *any* app without needing specific APIs or accessibility trees.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Appium
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Appium · recommended 2×
  2. UI Automator · recommended 2×
  3. XCUITest · recommended 2×
  4. Robot Framework · recommended 1×
  5. Appium Library · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to automate interactions within smartphone applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Appium
    2. UI Automator
    3. XCUITest
    4. Robot Framework
    5. Appium Library
    6. OpenCV
    7. SeeTest
    8. Test.ai
    9. OpenAI Gym
    10. Stable Baselines3
    11. Ray RLlib
    12. TensorFlow Lite

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are frameworks for building AI agents that control mobile device GUIs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Appium
    2. UI Automator
    3. XCUITest
    4. Maestro
    5. Detox
    6. Calabash

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent?
    pass
    AI did not name TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

TencentQQGYLab/AppAgent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite