RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

liruifengv/we-drawing

Default branch main · commit 2b390821 · scanned 6/11/2026, 8:07:00 AM

GitHub: 630 stars · 76 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface liruifengv/we-drawing, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Clarify the repository's 'About' description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    AI画图。每天一句中国古诗词，生成 AI 图片。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Automated daily AI image generation from Chinese classical poetry, powered by GitHub Actions and 302.AI's Kwai-Kolors/Kolors model.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand topics to include automation and specific use case

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agi, ai, astro, bing-image-creator, dall-e, dalle-3, llm, prompt
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-art-generator, daily-updates, github-actions, poetry-art, automated-generation, image-generation, astro, kwai-kolors, 302ai, chinese-poetry
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Why use this?' section to highlight automation and differentiation

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 为什么选择 We-Drawing？

厌倦了手动为每天的诗词或文本生成图片？We-Drawing 自动化了这一过程，每天从中国古诗词中自动生成独特的 AI 艺术图片，并发布到网站和 RSS 订阅。无需手动操作，即可享受每日更新的诗意视觉体验。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface liruifengv/we-drawing
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Midjourney
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Midjourney · recommended 2×
  2. Stable Diffusion · recommended 2×
  3. DALL-E 3 · recommended 2×
  4. Leonardo.Ai · recommended 2×
  5. Rapptz/discord.py · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automatically generate daily AI art from literary text prompts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Midjourney
    2. discord.py (Rapptz/discord.py)
    3. OpenAI's GPT-4
    4. Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus
    5. Stable Diffusion
    6. Automatic1111 Web UI (AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui)
    7. DALL-E 3
    8. Leonardo.Ai
    9. Python
    10. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    11. Anthropic's Claude 3 Sonnet
    12. Anthropic's Claude 3 Haiku
    13. Google Cloud Platform (GCP)
    14. Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    15. Microsoft Azure
    16. Google Drive
    17. Amazon S3

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named liruifengv/we-drawing. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are options for automating AI image creation from classical poetry quotes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Midjourney
    2. Discord
    3. discord.py
    4. Stable Diffusion
    5. Automatic1111 Web UI
    6. ComfyUI
    7. DALL-E 3
    8. ChatGPT Plus
    9. OpenAI API
    10. Leonardo.Ai
    11. Hugging Face Diffusers Library
    12. Stable Diffusion XL

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named liruifengv/we-drawing. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of liruifengv/we-drawing?
    pass
    AI did not name liruifengv/we-drawing — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts liruifengv/we-drawing in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named liruifengv/we-drawing explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo liruifengv/we-drawing solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named liruifengv/we-drawing explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of liruifengv/we-drawing. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/liruifengv/we-drawing.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/liruifengv/we-drawing)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/liruifengv/we-drawing"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/liruifengv/we-drawing.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

liruifengv/we-drawing — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite