RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow

Default branch master · commit 5f778799 · scanned 5/15/2026, 12:52:17 PM

GitHub: 8,197 stars · 1,407 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to highlight unique value proposition

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Wiseflow
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a clear, concise English tagline immediately after the `# Wiseflow` heading, such as: 'Wiseflow: Your 24/7 AI Agent Team for Online Business Operations and Revenue Generation.' This will immediately clarify the project's unique purpose.
  • mediumabout#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Update the repository's About section to include a link to the official project homepage, if one exists.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a dedicated 'License' section or statement in the README, clearly stating the terms under which Wiseflow is distributed, for example: 'Wiseflow is distributed under [Specific License Name/Terms]. Please refer to the `LICENSE` file for complete details.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI Assistants API · recommended 1×
  3. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  4. joaomdmoura/crewai · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Azure AI Studio · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I deploy an autonomous AI agent team for 24/7 online business operations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Assistants API
    2. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    3. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    4. CrewAI (joaomdmoura/crewai)
    5. Microsoft Azure AI Studio
    6. Google Cloud Vertex AI Agent Builder

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a multi-agent system to automate business development and sales tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    2. LangChain Agents
    3. CrewAI (joaomdmoura/crewAI)
    4. Open Interpreter (OpenInterpreter/Open-Interpreter)
    5. Microsoft AutoGen (microsoft/autogen)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow?
    pass
    AI named TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

TeamWiseFlow/wiseflow — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite