RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

PierreGode/Ragnar

Default branch main · commit 87f794f8 · scanned 6/1/2026, 11:01:53 PM

GitHub: 553 stars · 47 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface PierreGode/Ragnar, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    network-scanning, offensive-security, raspberry-pi, vulnerability-assessment, e-paper, headless-server, debian, security-tool, pentesting
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening sentence for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Ragnar is a fork of the awesome Bjorn project — a Tamagotchi-like autonomous network scanning, vulnerability assessment, and offensive security tool.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Ragnar is a powerful, autonomous network scanning and offensive security tool designed for Raspberry Pi with e-Paper HATs, headless Debian servers, and WiFi Pineapple Pagers. It discovers network targets, open ports, exposed services, and vulnerabilities.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the official project homepage URL (e.g., a GitHub Pages site or dedicated project website) to the repository settings.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface PierreGode/Ragnar
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Nmap
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Nmap · recommended 2×
  2. OpenVAS · recommended 1×
  3. Greenbone Vulnerability Management · recommended 1×
  4. Nikto · recommended 1×
  5. Masscan · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good network scanning and vulnerability assessment tools for Raspberry Pi?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Nmap
    2. OpenVAS
    3. Greenbone Vulnerability Management
    4. Nikto
    5. Masscan
    6. Wireshark
    7. Aircrack-ng

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named PierreGode/Ragnar. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an offensive security tool to run headless on a Debian server.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Nmap
    2. Metasploit Framework (Rapid7/metasploit-framework)
    3. Nikto (sullo/nikto)
    4. sqlmap (sqlmapproject/sqlmap)
    5. Aircrack-ng (aircrack-ng/aircrack-ng)
    6. Hashcat (hashcat/hashcat)
    7. Hydra (vanhauser-thc/thc-hydra)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named PierreGode/Ragnar. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of PierreGode/Ragnar?
    pass
    AI named PierreGode/Ragnar explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts PierreGode/Ragnar in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named PierreGode/Ragnar explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo PierreGode/Ragnar solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named PierreGode/Ragnar explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of PierreGode/Ragnar. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/PierreGode/Ragnar.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/PierreGode/Ragnar)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/PierreGode/Ragnar"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/PierreGode/Ragnar.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

PierreGode/Ragnar — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite