RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub

Default branch main · commit 3ed19c1f · scanned 5/17/2026, 2:06:59 PM

GitHub: 1,981 stars · 246 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear introductory sentence to the README emphasizing its 'hub' nature

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    DB-GPT-Hub serves as a dedicated hub for Text-to-SQL models, datasets, and fine-tuning techniques, specifically designed to enhance LLM performance for natural language to SQL conversion and related database interaction tasks.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to include 'hub' and specific content types

    Why:

    CURRENT
    database, datasets, fine-tuning, gpt, hacktoberfest, llm, nl2sql, sql, text-to-sql, text2sql
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    database, datasets, fine-tuning, gpt, hacktoberfest, llm, llm-hub, nl2sql, sql, text-to-sql, text-to-sql-models, text2sql, fine-tuning-datasets

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Hugging Face Transformers
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 1×
  2. peft · recommended 1×
  3. LangChain · recommended 1×
  4. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I enhance large language model performance for accurate natural language to SQL conversion?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers
    2. peft
    3. LangChain
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. OpenAI GPT-4
    6. Anthropic Claude
    7. Google Gemini
    8. psycopg2
    9. mysql-connector-python
    10. sqlglot
    11. Spider dataset-trained models
    12. T5-based models
    13. Pinecone
    14. Weaviate
    15. ChromaDB

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find datasets and fine-tuning techniques to optimize LLMs for text-to-SQL tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Spider Dataset
    2. WikiSQL Dataset
    3. BIRD (Big Bench for LLM-based Text-to-SQL)
    4. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    5. PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning)
    6. LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
    7. Hugging Face `peft` library
    8. T5
    9. BART
    10. LLaMA
    11. CodeLlama
    12. LLaMA 2
    13. Awesome-Text-to-SQL GitHub Repository
    14. Microsoft's Text-to-SQL Resources

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub?
    pass
    AI did not name eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

eosphoros-ai/DB-GPT-Hub — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite