RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit

Default branch main · commit c2274b94 · scanned 5/22/2026, 5:12:38 PM

GitHub: 2,941 stars · 395 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README to clarify its nature as a Windows 11 toolkit

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README starts with the title "Windows11 Penetration Suite Toolkit v6.0" followed by update notes.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following sentence directly after the H1: "This repository provides a curated collection of essential tools and scripts to quickly set up a comprehensive penetration testing environment specifically for Windows 11."
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific, relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["penetration-testing", "windows-11", "security-tools", "ethical-hacking", "toolkit", "cybersecurity", "pentesting-environment"]
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root and choose a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) that best suits your project's intent. Ensure the chosen license is clearly stated within the file.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Kali Linux
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Kali Linux · recommended 2×
  2. Parrot Security OS · recommended 2×
  3. BlackArch Linux · recommended 2×
  4. WSL 2 · recommended 1×
  5. VMware Workstation Player · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best pre-configured penetration testing environments for Windows 11?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Kali Linux
    2. WSL 2
    3. VMware Workstation Player
    4. VirtualBox
    5. Parrot Security OS
    6. Commando VM (mandiant/commando-vm)
    7. Flare VM (mandiant/flare-vm)
    8. BlackArch Linux

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to quickly set up a comprehensive security testing toolkit with all dependencies?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Kali Linux
    2. Parrot Security OS
    3. BlackArch Linux
    4. OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) (OWASP/ZAP)
    5. Security Onion (Security-Onion-Solutions/securityonion)
    6. Pwnagotchi (evilsocket/pwnagotchi)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit?
    pass
    AI named makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

makoto56/penetration-suite-toolkit — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite