RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm

Default branch main · commit 54a84414 · scanned 6/10/2026, 1:43:04 PM

GitHub: 789 stars · 69 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify repo type as an 'awesome list' in README opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > A collection of papers and projects related to LLMs and corresponding data-centric methods.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    > This is an awesome list and curated collection of papers and projects related to LLMs and corresponding data-centric methods.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    (Create a LICENSE file, e.g., MIT or Apache-2.0, and add it to the repository root.)
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add 'awesome-list' and 'survey' to repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    data-acquisition, data-deduplication, data-filtering, data-mixing, data-provenance, data-selection, data-synthesis, data-transformation, llm, vlm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome-list, survey, data-acquisition, data-deduplication, data-filtering, data-mixing, data-provenance, data-selection, data-synthesis, data-transformation, llm, vlm

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
databricks/dolly
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. databricks/dolly · recommended 1×
  2. togethercomputer/RedPajama-Data · recommended 1×
  3. tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca · recommended 1×
  4. lmsys/vicuna · recommended 1×
  5. FLAN · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective data-centric methods for improving large language model performance and reliability?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Dolly 2.0 (databricks/dolly)
    2. RedPajama-Data (togethercomputer/RedPajama-Data)
    3. Alpaca (tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca)
    4. Vicuna (lmsys/vicuna)
    5. FLAN
    6. ChatGPT
    7. InstructGPT
    8. Self-Instruct
    9. ShareGPT
    10. Snorkel (snorkel-team/snorkel)
    11. Label Studio (heartexlabs/label-studio)
    12. BioGPT (microsoft/BioGPT)
    13. BloombergGPT

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking tools and techniques for data preparation, synthesis, and transformation in LLM development.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Snorkel
    2. Argilla
    3. Cleanlab
    4. Pandas
    5. Hugging Face Datasets library
    6. Dataiku
    7. Synthetic Data Vault (SDV)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm?
    pass
    AI named OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

OpenDataBox/awesome-data-llm — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite