RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource

Default branch main · commit 528d9351 · scanned 5/23/2026, 7:26:50 AM

GitHub: 3,229 stars · 119 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add an explicit statement to the README's opening to counter AI hallucination

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current opening paragraph after the H1: `The definitive list of the best of everything open source`
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new, very prominent line right after the H1, e.g., `This is a curated list of actual, consumer-facing open source applications (desktop, self-hosted, CLI), NOT a satirical project or a guide to open source definitions.`
  • hightopics#2
    Expand repository topics to include specific categories and types of lists

    Why:

    CURRENT
    list, opensource
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    curated-list, awesome-list, open-source-apps, desktop-apps, self-hosted, cli-tools, consumer-software, software-recommendations
  • mediumabout#3
    Refine the repository description to emphasize 'curated collection' of 'applications'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The definitive list of the best of (consumer facing) open source.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A definitive, curated list of the best consumer-facing open source applications (desktop, self-hosted, CLI).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Mozilla Firefox
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Mozilla Firefox · recommended 1×
  2. LibreOffice · recommended 1×
  3. VLC Media Player · recommended 1×
  4. GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program) · recommended 1×
  5. Thunderbird · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are some highly-rated open source applications for daily use on desktop?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mozilla Firefox
    2. LibreOffice
    3. VLC Media Player
    4. GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program)
    5. Thunderbird
    6. Krita
    7. OBS Studio

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a curated list of robust open source self-hosted utilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Awesome-Selfhosted (awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted)
    2. Self-Hosted.show
    3. r/selfhosted
    4. HomelabOS
    5. Cloudron

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource?
    pass
    AI did not name mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mustbeperfect/definitive-opensource — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite