RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

snyk/agent-scan

Default branch main · commit b76beee1 · scanned 5/22/2026, 6:36:34 AM

GitHub: 2,450 stars · 226 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface snyk/agent-scan, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clarify AI agent security focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1 align="center">Snyk Agent Scan</h1>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1 align="center">Snyk Agent Scan: AI Agent Security Scanner</h1>
  • mediumreadme#2
    Elevate the 'Security Warning' about command execution

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the entire 'Security Warning' section to immediately follow the initial descriptive paragraph, before any installation or usage instructions.
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled 'Comparison to Alternatives' in the README. This section should briefly explain how `snyk/agent-scan` differs from tools like Giskard, Lakera Guard, or Rebuff by focusing on agent component scanning for prompt injections and vulnerabilities, rather than generic LLM firewalls or container scanning.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface snyk/agent-scan
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GiskardAI/giskard
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GiskardAI/giskard · recommended 1×
  2. Lakera Guard · recommended 1×
  3. mithril-security/blindai · recommended 1×
  4. protectai/rebuff · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI Moderation API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to scan AI agent components for prompt injection vulnerabilities and malware?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Giskard (GiskardAI/giskard)
    2. Lakera Guard
    3. Mithril Security's BlindAI (mithril-security/blindai)
    4. Rebuff (protectai/rebuff)
    5. OpenAI Moderation API
    6. SonarQube
    7. Snyk Code
    8. OWASP ZAP (zaproxy/zaproxy)
    9. Burp Suite

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named snyk/agent-scan. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to inventory and secure my machine's AI agent skills and MCP servers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Microsoft Defender for Cloud
    2. Tenable.io
    3. Qualys Cloud Platform
    4. CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR
    5. ServiceNow IT Operations Management (ITOM) with Discovery
    6. Ansible

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named snyk/agent-scan. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of snyk/agent-scan?
    pass
    AI named snyk/agent-scan explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts snyk/agent-scan in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named snyk/agent-scan explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo snyk/agent-scan solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named snyk/agent-scan explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of snyk/agent-scan. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/snyk/agent-scan.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/snyk/agent-scan)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/snyk/agent-scan"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/snyk/agent-scan.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

snyk/agent-scan — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
snyk/agent-scan — RepoGEO report