RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

reorx/httpstat

Default branch master · commit b37cd465 · scanned 5/22/2026, 5:42:10 PM

GitHub: 6,211 stars · 385 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface reorx/httpstat, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to highlight unique visualization value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # httpstat

httpstat visualizes `curl(1)` statistics in a way of beauty and clarity.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # httpstat

httpstat transforms `curl(1)`'s raw network timing data into beautiful, clear, and color-coded waterfall diagrams directly in your terminal. It makes HTTP request performance analysis simple and intuitive, providing a visual breakdown of DNS, TCP, TLS, server processing, and content transfer, offering immediate insights beyond `curl --write-out`'s raw metrics.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/reorx/httpstat
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics related to performance analysis

    Why:

    CURRENT
    cli, curl, http, python, visualization
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cli, curl, http, python, visualization, performance-analysis, network-diagnostics

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface reorx/httpstat
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
curl
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. curl · recommended 2×
  2. httpie/httpie · recommended 1×
  3. ducaale/xh · recommended 1×
  4. asciimoo/wuzz · recommended 1×
  5. httperf · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I visualize HTTP request timing breakdowns directly in my terminal?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. curl
    2. httpie (httpie/httpie)
    3. xh (ducaale/xh)
    4. wuzz (asciimoo/wuzz)
    5. httperf

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named reorx/httpstat. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What's a good command-line tool for analyzing web request performance metrics?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. curl
    2. ApacheBench (ab)
    3. wrk (wg/wrk)
    4. h2load (nghttp2/nghttp2)
    5. k6 (grafana/k6)
    6. siege (JoeDog/siege)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named reorx/httpstat. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of reorx/httpstat?
    pass
    AI named reorx/httpstat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts reorx/httpstat in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named reorx/httpstat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo reorx/httpstat solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named reorx/httpstat explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of reorx/httpstat. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/reorx/httpstat.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/reorx/httpstat)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/reorx/httpstat"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/reorx/httpstat.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

reorx/httpstat — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite