RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

tsingyuai/scientify

Default branch main · commit c7c3efc0 · scanned 6/17/2026, 2:11:50 AM

GitHub: 847 stars · 73 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface tsingyuai/scientify, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify Scientify's unique role and relationship to OpenClaw in the English README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README excerpt mentions 'OpenClaw' but doesn't clearly define Scientify's relationship to it or its unique value in English at the top.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a clear, concise English statement at the very beginning of `README.en.md` (or the main README if it's intended to be bilingual) that defines `scientify` and its core differentiator, explicitly stating its relationship to OpenClaw. For example: 'Scientify is an AI-powered scientific research system built *on top of* OpenClaw, designed to automate the end-to-end research workflow. Unlike generic workflow orchestrators or low-level SML frameworks, Scientify continuously monitors literature, generates evolving hypotheses, and delivers state-of-the-art research results.'
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the text of the MIT License.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface tsingyuai/scientify
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
nextflow-io/nextflow
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. nextflow-io/nextflow · recommended 1×
  2. snakemake/snakemake · recommended 1×
  3. apache/airflow · recommended 1×
  4. PrefectHQ/prefect · recommended 1×
  5. spotify/luigi · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an automated end-to-end workflow for scientific research, not just one-off tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Nextflow (nextflow-io/nextflow)
    2. Snakemake (snakemake/snakemake)
    3. Apache Airflow (apache/airflow)
    4. Prefect (PrefectHQ/prefect)
    5. Luigi (spotify/luigi)
    6. Pachyderm (pachyderm/pachyderm)
    7. CWL (Common Workflow Language) (common-workflow-language/common-workflow-language)
    8. WDL (Workflow Description Language) (openwdl/wdl)
    9. Cromwell (broadinstitute/cromwell)
    10. Toil (DataBiosphere/toil)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named tsingyuai/scientify. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools provide continuous scientific literature monitoring and evolving hypothesis generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Iris.ai
    3. Semantic Scholar
    4. ResearchRabbit
    5. Connected Papers
    6. Scite.ai

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named tsingyuai/scientify. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of tsingyuai/scientify?
    pass
    AI named tsingyuai/scientify explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts tsingyuai/scientify in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named tsingyuai/scientify explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo tsingyuai/scientify solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named tsingyuai/scientify explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of tsingyuai/scientify. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/tsingyuai/scientify.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/tsingyuai/scientify)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/tsingyuai/scientify"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/tsingyuai/scientify.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

tsingyuai/scientify — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite