RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks

Default branch main · commit 472f1206 · scanned 6/6/2026, 3:44:01 PM

GitHub: 657 stars · 63 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, large-language-models, graph-neural-networks, graph-tasks, research-papers, awesome-list, survey, machine-learning, artificial-intelligence
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README opening to emphasize 'curated collection' and 'survey companion'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > This is a collection of papers on leveraging **Large Language Models** in **Graph Tasks**. It's based on our survey paper: A Survey of Graph Meets Large Language Model: Progress and Future Directions.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository is the official curated collection of research papers on leveraging Large Language Models in Graph Tasks, accompanying our survey paper: "A Survey of Graph Meets Large Language Model: Progress and Future Directions" (accepted by IJCAI 2024 survey track).
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0) in the repository root to clearly state the terms of use for the collection.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
PyTorch Geometric (PyG)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. PyTorch Geometric (PyG) · recommended 1×
  2. Deep Graph Library (DGL) · recommended 1×
  3. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 1×
  4. GraphGPT · recommended 1×
  5. LangChain · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the latest advancements in applying large language models to solve graph-related problems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PyTorch Geometric (PyG)
    2. Deep Graph Library (DGL)
    3. Hugging Face Transformers
    4. GraphGPT
    5. LangChain
    6. LlamaIndex
    7. Neo4j
    8. Amazon Neptune
    9. Neo4j AuraDB
    10. OpenAI GPT-4
    11. Anthropic Claude
    12. T5
    13. BART
    14. RecBole
    15. LightGCN
    16. Google's Vertex AI

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a curated collection of research on LLM applications in graph analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Awesome-LLM-Graph
    2. Papers With Code
    3. arXiv
    4. Google Scholar
    5. Towards Data Science (Medium)
    6. Analytics Vidhya
    7. NeurIPS
    8. ICML
    9. ICLR
    10. KDD

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks?
    pass
    AI did not name yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

yhLeeee/Awesome-LLMs-in-Graph-tasks — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite