RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability

Default branch main · commit d2c30d57 · scanned 5/27/2026, 12:07:41 AM

GitHub: 1,499 stars · 111 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to emphasize 'resource list' and add specific topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A curated list of amazingly awesome tools, papers, articles, and communities focused on Large Language Model (LLM) Interpretability.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides a comprehensive, curated directory of resources for Large Language Model (LLM) Interpretability, encompassing key papers, articles, communities, and relevant tools.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    awesome, awesome-list
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome, awesome-list, llm-interpretability, llm-explainability, xai, machine-learning-interpretability, resource-list, curated-list
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the content of the MIT License.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Weights & Biases
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Weights & Biases · recommended 2×
  2. llamaindex/llamaindex · recommended 1×
  3. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI's Interpretability Research · recommended 1×
  5. pytorch/captum · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I understand the internal reasoning and decision-making process of large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LlamaIndex (llamaindex/llamaindex)
    2. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    3. OpenAI's Interpretability Research
    4. Captum (pytorch/captum)
    5. LIME (marcotcr/lime)
    6. SHAP (shap/shap)
    7. Weights & Biases

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools are available for debugging and evaluating the behavior of large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Weights & Biases
    2. LangChain
    3. DeepEval
    4. Phoenix
    5. Humanloop
    6. MLflow
    7. OpenAI Evals

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability?
    pass
    AI did not name JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

JShollaj/awesome-llm-interpretability — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite