RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Uberi/speech_recognition

Default branch master · commit 7126fff8 · scanned 5/24/2026, 6:02:44 AM

GitHub: 8,963 stars · 2,424 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
45 /100
Critical
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #7.0 when recommended
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Uberi/speech_recognition, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify unique value proposition

    Why:

    CURRENT
    SpeechRecognition
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Uberi/speech_recognition is a comprehensive Python library that provides a unified, high-level interface to multiple speech recognition engines and APIs, supporting both online and offline transcription. It abstracts away the complexities of individual services, allowing developers to easily integrate speech-to-text capabilities into their Python applications.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to highlight multi-engine and abstraction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    audio, python, speech-recognition, speech-to-text
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    audio, python, speech-recognition, speech-to-text, multi-engine, api-wrapper, offline-speech-recognition, online-speech-recognition
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Key Features' or 'Why Choose This Library?' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Key Features
    - **Unified API:** Seamlessly switch between various speech recognition engines with a single, consistent interface.
    - **Broad Engine Support:** Integrates with popular online services (e.g., Google Cloud Speech-to-Text, Microsoft Azure Speech, IBM Watson Speech to Text) and offline engines (e.g., CMU Sphinx, Vosk).
    - **Flexible Audio Input:** Supports various audio sources, including microphone input, audio files, and raw audio data.
    - **Easy to Use:** Designed for Python developers seeking straightforward integration of speech-to-text functionality.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface Uberi/speech_recognition
Avg rank
#7.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
6%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AssemblyAI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AssemblyAI · recommended 2×
  2. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text · recommended 2×
  3. AWS Transcribe · recommended 1×
  4. openai/whisper · recommended 1×
  5. Azure Cognitive Services Speech · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What is a reliable Python library for converting spoken audio into text?
    you: #7
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AssemblyAI
    2. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
    3. AWS Transcribe
    4. OpenAI Whisper (openai/whisper)
    5. Azure Cognitive Services Speech
    6. DeepSpeech (mozilla/DeepSpeech)
    7. SpeechRecognition (Uberi/speech_recognition) ← you
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a versatile Python module for speech-to-text, supporting both online and offline recognition.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. SpeechRecognition
    2. Vosk API
    3. DeepSpeech
    4. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
    5. google-cloud-speech
    6. AssemblyAI
    7. assemblyai
    8. Whisper
    9. openai-whisper
    10. transformers

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named Uberi/speech_recognition. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Uberi/speech_recognition?
    pass
    AI did not name Uberi/speech_recognition — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Uberi/speech_recognition in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Uberi/speech_recognition explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Uberi/speech_recognition solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Uberi/speech_recognition — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Uberi/speech_recognition. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Uberi/speech_recognition.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Uberi/speech_recognition)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Uberi/speech_recognition"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Uberi/speech_recognition.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Uberi/speech_recognition — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite