RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NadirRouter/NadirClaw

Default branch main · commit 3be0f728 · scanned 6/11/2026, 4:01:49 AM

GitHub: 518 stars · 65 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NadirRouter/NadirClaw, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify NadirClaw's domain immediately after the H1

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">
  <strong>Your simple prompts are burning premium tokens.</strong><br>
  NadirClaw routes them to cheaper models automatically. Save 40-70% on AI API costs.
</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">
  <strong>NadirClaw: The Open-Source LLM Router & AI Cost Optimizer.</strong><br>
  Routes simple prompts to cheaper models automatically. Save 40-70% on AI API costs.
</p>
  • mediumreadme#2
    Emphasize 'self-hosted' and 'OpenAI-compatible proxy' in the README's opening

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">
  NadirClaw is a self-hosted, drop-in OpenAI-compatible proxy for LLMs, designed to optimize model usage and reduce API costs.
</p>

<p align="center">
  Works with <strong>Claude Code</strong> · <strong>Cursor</strong> · <strong>Continue</strong> · <strong>Aider</strong> · <strong>Windsurf</strong> · <strong>Codex</strong> · <strong>OpenClaw</strong> · <strong>Open WebUI</strong> · Any OpenAI-compatible client
</p>
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a prominent 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## NadirClaw vs. Alternatives

See how NadirClaw compares to other LLM routers and proxies in our detailed [comparison guide](docs/comparison.md).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NadirRouter/NadirClaw
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI Function Calling · recommended 1×
  3. BerriAI/litellm · recommended 1×
  4. guardrails-ai/guardrails · recommended 1×
  5. AWS Lambda · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically route LLM prompts to cheaper models to reduce API costs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. OpenAI Function Calling
    3. LiteLLM (BerriAI/litellm)
    4. Guardrails AI (guardrails-ai/guardrails)
    5. AWS Lambda
    6. Google Cloud Functions
    7. Vellum

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named NadirRouter/NadirClaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a self-hosted OpenAI-compatible proxy for LLMs that optimizes model usage and cost.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LiteLLM
    2. OpenRouter
    3. LocalAI
    4. Helicone
    5. Portkey.ai
    6. FastChat

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named NadirRouter/NadirClaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NadirRouter/NadirClaw?
    pass
    AI named NadirRouter/NadirClaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NadirRouter/NadirClaw in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NadirRouter/NadirClaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NadirRouter/NadirClaw solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named NadirRouter/NadirClaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NadirRouter/NadirClaw. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NadirRouter/NadirClaw.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NadirRouter/NadirClaw)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NadirRouter/NadirClaw"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NadirRouter/NadirClaw.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NadirRouter/NadirClaw — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite