RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

brycedrennan/imaginAIry

Default branch master · commit 1c79db1d · scanned 5/20/2026, 10:03:17 PM

GitHub: 8,150 stars · 474 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface brycedrennan/imaginAIry, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening statement

    Why:

    CURRENT
    AI imagined images. Pythonic generation of stable diffusion images **and videos!.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ImaginAIry is a user-friendly, Pythonic application and library for direct AI generation of high-quality images and videos using Stable Diffusion. It provides a streamlined, "batteries-included" experience, designed to 'just work' for creatives and developers seeking local control over their AI art.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://pypi.org/project/imaginairy/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface brycedrennan/imaginAIry
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
huggingface/diffusers
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. huggingface/diffusers · recommended 1×
  2. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. Google Cloud Vertex AI · recommended 1×
  5. Replicate API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Python library to generate AI images and videos from text prompts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Diffusers (huggingface/diffusers)
    2. Hugging Face Transformers library (huggingface/transformers)
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    5. Replicate API
    6. Pytorch (pytorch/pytorch)
    7. Keras (keras-team/keras)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named brycedrennan/imaginAIry. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for creating AI-generated videos from a starting image in a Python environment?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RunwayML Gen-1 / Gen-2
    2. Stable Diffusion
    3. Deforum Stable Diffusion
    4. ControlNet
    5. DeepMotion
    6. PyTorchVideo
    7. OpenAI Jukebox

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named brycedrennan/imaginAIry. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of brycedrennan/imaginAIry?
    pass
    AI did not name brycedrennan/imaginAIry — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts brycedrennan/imaginAIry in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named brycedrennan/imaginAIry explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo brycedrennan/imaginAIry solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named brycedrennan/imaginAIry explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of brycedrennan/imaginAIry. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/brycedrennan/imaginAIry.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/brycedrennan/imaginAIry)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/brycedrennan/imaginAIry"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/brycedrennan/imaginAIry.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

brycedrennan/imaginAIry — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite