RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

berbicanes/apiark

Default branch main · commit 46ba45ac · scanned 6/29/2026, 8:46:12 AM

GitHub: 1,107 stars · 59 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface berbicanes/apiark, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and subtitle to clearly state its category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1 align="center">ApiArk</h1>
<p align="center">
  <strong>The API platform that respects your privacy, your RAM, and your Git workflow.</strong>
</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1 align="center">ApiArk: Privacy-First Desktop API Client</h1>
<p align="center">
  <strong>A lightweight, local-only API platform and Postman alternative that respects your privacy, your RAM, and your Git workflow.</strong>
</p>
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/berbicanes/apiark/releases/latest
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to include more specific API testing terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    api-client, desktop-app, developer-tools, rust, tauri, typescript
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    api-client, desktop-app, developer-tools, rust, tauri, typescript, api-testing, rest-client, postman-alternative

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface berbicanes/apiark
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Paw
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Paw · recommended 2×
  2. Insomnia · recommended 1×
  3. Postman · recommended 1×
  4. HTTPie · recommended 1×
  5. cURL · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a privacy-first, lightweight desktop API client with minimal RAM usage.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Insomnia
    2. Postman
    3. Paw
    4. HTTPie
    5. cURL
    6. Bruno
    7. Thunder Client

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named berbicanes/apiark. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are some good local-only API testing tools that don't require cloud accounts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Postman Desktop App
    2. Insomnia (Kong/insomnia)
    3. Thunder Client (rangav/thunder-client-vscode)
    4. cURL (curl/curl)
    5. HTTPie (httpie/httpie)
    6. Paw

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named berbicanes/apiark. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of berbicanes/apiark?
    pass
    AI named berbicanes/apiark explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts berbicanes/apiark in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named berbicanes/apiark explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo berbicanes/apiark solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named berbicanes/apiark explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of berbicanes/apiark. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/berbicanes/apiark.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/berbicanes/apiark)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/berbicanes/apiark"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/berbicanes/apiark.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

berbicanes/apiark — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite