RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing

Default branch main · commit 2e08f68a · scanned 5/12/2026, 12:18:05 PM

GitHub: 1,062 stars · 21 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to highlight its unique value proposition

    Why:

    CURRENT
    AIが生成した文章によく見られる記述パターンを検出します。
より自然な日本語表現を促すtextlintルールプリセットです。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AIが生成した文章によく見られる記述パターンを検出し、より自然で人間らしい日本語表現を促すtextlintルールプリセットです。特に、AIが書いた文章をAIがチェック・改善するMCPサーバ連携ワークフローに最適化されています。
  • mediumabout#2
    Refine the 'About' description to emphasize human-like quality and AI workflow integration

    Why:

    CURRENT
    textlintプリセット：AIっぽい記述パターンを検出し、より自然な日本語表現を促すルール集
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    textlintプリセット：AIが生成した文章にありがちな機械的な記述パターンを検出し、人間らしい自然な日本語表現へと改善を促すルール集。AI生成コンテンツの品質向上と、より自然なコミュニケーションを目指します。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
DeepL Pro
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. DeepL Pro · recommended 1×
  2. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  3. GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  4. Google Cloud Translation Advanced · recommended 1×
  5. Amazon Translate · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to make AI-generated Japanese content sound more natural and less robotic?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DeepL Pro
    2. ChatGPT
    3. GPT-4
    4. Google Cloud Translation Advanced
    5. Amazon Translate
    6. Voicevox
    7. CoeFont
    8. LangCorrect
    9. HiNative
    10. Grammarly
    11. DeepL Write

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a linter to detect unnatural writing styles in AI-produced Japanese text.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AI-Writer
    2. Originality.ai
    3. GPTZero
    4. Writer.com
    5. CopyLeaks
    6. Turnitin
    7. Sapling AI Content Detector

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing?
    pass
    AI did not name textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

textlint-ja/textlint-rule-preset-ai-writing — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite