RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

phodal/auto-dev

Default branch master · commit 23777fe2 · scanned 6/25/2026, 6:56:54 AM

GitHub: 4,511 stars · 491 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface phodal/auto-dev, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Expand GitHub Topics to include SDLC and agent-related terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    aigc, genai, genaistack, ide, intellij
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    aigc, genai, genaistack, ide, intellij, sdlc, devops, automation, multi-agent-system, agent-platform
  • mediumreadme#2
    Reposition README opening to explicitly emphasize full SDLC automation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    AutoDev Xiuper is an AI-native, multi-agent development platform built on Kotlin Multiplatform.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AutoDev Xiuper is an AI-native, multi-agent development platform built on Kotlin Multiplatform, designed to automate and cover all 7 phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC).
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., '## Comparison with Alternatives', explaining how AutoDev differs from single-phase or single-IDE AI tools by covering the full SDLC with a multi-agent approach.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface phodal/auto-dev
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot Enterprise
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise · recommended 2×
  2. JetBrains AI Assistant · recommended 2×
  3. CodiumAI · recommended 1×
  4. Google Cloud Vertex AI Workbench · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Azure DevOps · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI-powered development platform to automate the entire software development lifecycle.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise
    2. CodiumAI
    3. Google Cloud Vertex AI Workbench
    4. Microsoft Azure DevOps
    5. GitHub Copilot
    6. JetBrains AI Assistant
    7. Hugging Face Spaces
    8. AutoTrain

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named phodal/auto-dev. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best multiplatform AI coding assistants with agent capabilities and IDE integration?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise
    2. Cursor
    3. JetBrains AI Assistant
    4. Codeium
    5. Tabnine Pro
    6. Continue (Continue-team/continue)
    7. Smol-AI (Smol Developer) (smol-ai/smol-developer)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named phodal/auto-dev. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of phodal/auto-dev?
    pass
    AI named phodal/auto-dev explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts phodal/auto-dev in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named phodal/auto-dev explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo phodal/auto-dev solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named phodal/auto-dev explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of phodal/auto-dev. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/phodal/auto-dev.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/phodal/auto-dev)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/phodal/auto-dev"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/phodal/auto-dev.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

phodal/auto-dev — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite