RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

qy527145/acemcp

Default branch main · commit 41c58a26 · scanned 6/13/2026, 3:53:29 AM

GitHub: 813 stars · 114 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface qy527145/acemcp, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to explicitly state the problem and audience

    Why:

    CURRENT
    代码库索引和语义搜索的 MCP 服务器。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Acemcp 是一个将您的代码库转化为可搜索、可理解的知识库的 MCP 服务器，专为需要为AI助手提供增强上下文的开发者和团队设计。
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    semantic-search, code-indexing, ai-context, rag, local-llm, mcp-server, code-understanding
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://mseep.ai/app/qy527145-acemcp

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface qy527145/acemcp
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
PrivateGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. PrivateGPT · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. LangChain · recommended 1×
  4. Ollama · recommended 1×
  5. Weaviate · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I set up a local server for semantic code search and AI context augmentation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PrivateGPT
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. LangChain
    4. Ollama
    5. Weaviate
    6. Qdrant
    7. Elasticsearch

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named qy527145/acemcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help index my local codebase for AI-powered code understanding and retrieval?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Continue.dev (continue-dev/continue)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    4. OpenGrok (OpenGrok/OpenGrok)
    5. Universal Ctags (universal-ctags/ctags)
    6. Faiss (facebookresearch/faiss)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named qy527145/acemcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of qy527145/acemcp?
    pass
    AI named qy527145/acemcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts qy527145/acemcp in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named qy527145/acemcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo qy527145/acemcp solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name qy527145/acemcp — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of qy527145/acemcp. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/qy527145/acemcp.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/qy527145/acemcp)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/qy527145/acemcp"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/qy527145/acemcp.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

qy527145/acemcp — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite