RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR

Default branch main · commit c9222958 · scanned 6/24/2026, 8:37:47 PM

GitHub: 1,196 stars · 128 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root. Based on the README's statement 'OpenCRISPR is free for commercial use to any users who take a license,' consider adding a permissive license like Apache-2.0 or MIT, or explicitly state the licensing terms in the file.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the URL to the OpenCRISPR preprint or the Profluent Bio website as the repository homepage URL in the About section.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AlphaFold
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AlphaFold · recommended 1×
  2. CRISPR-Cas9 · recommended 1×
  3. CRISPResso2 · recommended 1×
  4. DeepCRISPR · recommended 1×
  5. Prime Editing · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for AI-designed gene editing tools to explore novel biological pathways.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AlphaFold
    2. CRISPR-Cas9
    3. CRISPResso2
    4. DeepCRISPR
    5. Prime Editing
    6. Base Editing
    7. DETECTR
    8. SHERLOCK
    9. Synthego's Full Stack Genome Engineering
    10. CRISPR Design Tool
    11. AlphaMissense

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need an RNA-guided nuclease for precise genomic modifications with NGG PAM.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. SpCas9
    2. SpCas9-HF1
    3. eSpCas9(1.1)
    4. xCas9
    5. Cas9-NG

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR?
    pass
    AI named Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Profluent-AI/OpenCRISPR — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite