RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

opactorai/Claudable

Default branch main · commit 2634077b · scanned 5/19/2026, 5:46:52 PM

GitHub: 3,964 stars · 592 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface opactorai/Claudable, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to clearly state its core identity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Claudable
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Claudable: AI Web Builder powered by Local CLI Agents
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific AI-related web builder topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, claude, claude-code, codex, codingagent, free, gemini, local, lovable, qwen, web-builder
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, claude, claude-code, codex, codingagent, free, gemini, local, lovable, qwen, web-builder, ai-web-builder, ai-coding-agent
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/opactorai/Claudable (or a dedicated project website if available)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface opactorai/Claudable
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
vercel/ai
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. vercel/ai · recommended 1×
  2. vercel/next.js · recommended 1×
  3. Vercel Deploy · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI's GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  5. GPT-3.5 Turbo · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to quickly build web applications from a text description using AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Vercel AI SDK (vercel/ai)
    2. Next.js (vercel/next.js)
    3. Vercel Deploy
    4. OpenAI's GPT-4
    5. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    6. GitHub Copilot
    7. Anima App
    8. Replit AI
    9. CodeWP

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named opactorai/Claudable. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an open-source web app builder that leverages local AI coding tools.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gradio
    2. Streamlit
    3. Anvil
    4. Budibase
    5. ToolJet

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named opactorai/Claudable. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of opactorai/Claudable?
    pass
    AI named opactorai/Claudable explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts opactorai/Claudable in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named opactorai/Claudable explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo opactorai/Claudable solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named opactorai/Claudable explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of opactorai/Claudable. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/opactorai/Claudable.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/opactorai/Claudable)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/opactorai/Claudable"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/opactorai/Claudable.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

opactorai/Claudable — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite