RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

rbgirshick/rcnn

Default branch master · commit 43b0334e · scanned 5/10/2026, 10:26:40 PM

GitHub: 2,416 stars · 976 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface rbgirshick/rcnn, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Emphasize R-CNN's foundational role in the README introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ### This code base is no longer maintained and exists as a historical artifact to supplement our CVPR and PAMI papers on Region-based Convolutional Neural Netwoks. For more recent work that's faster and more accurrate, please see Fast and Faster R-CNN.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ### This code base is a foundational implementation of Region-based Convolutional Neural Networks (R-CNN), a landmark deep learning approach for object detection. It is no longer maintained and exists as a historical artifact to supplement our CVPR and PAMI papers. For more recent, faster, and more accurate work, please see Fast and Faster R-CNN.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage link to the original research paper

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://www.cv-foundation.org/openaccess/content_cvpr_2014/papers/Girshick_Rich_Feature_Hierarchies_2014_CVPR_paper.pdf

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface rbgirshick/rcnn
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Faster R-CNN
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Faster R-CNN · recommended 2×
  2. Mask R-CNN · recommended 2×
  3. YOLO · recommended 1×
  4. YOLOv3 · recommended 1×
  5. YOLOv4 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are classic deep learning approaches for object detection in images?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. YOLO
    2. YOLOv3
    3. YOLOv4
    4. YOLOv5
    5. YOLOv7
    6. YOLOv8
    7. Faster R-CNN
    8. R-CNN
    9. Fast R-CNN
    10. SSD
    11. RetinaNet
    12. Mask R-CNN

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named rbgirshick/rcnn. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Which region-proposal based neural network architectures are best for visual object recognition?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cascade R-CNN
    2. Faster R-CNN
    3. Mask R-CNN
    4. Libra R-CNN
    5. Feature Pyramid Network (FPN)
    6. R-CNN (Regions with Convolutional Neural Networks)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named rbgirshick/rcnn. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of rbgirshick/rcnn?
    pass
    AI named rbgirshick/rcnn explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts rbgirshick/rcnn in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named rbgirshick/rcnn explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo rbgirshick/rcnn solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named rbgirshick/rcnn explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of rbgirshick/rcnn. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/rbgirshick/rcnn.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/rbgirshick/rcnn)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/rbgirshick/rcnn"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/rbgirshick/rcnn.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

rbgirshick/rcnn — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite