RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

DimensionDev/Flare

Default branch master · commit a7798272 · scanned 5/21/2026, 11:47:06 AM

GitHub: 1,218 stars · 50 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface DimensionDev/Flare, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    social-media, mastodon, bluesky, misskey, nostr, rss, unified-timeline, cross-platform, kotlin-multiplatform, social-client, privacy-focused
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., "## Why Flare? How We Compare" or "## Flare vs. Other Social Clients", detailing key differences from tools like Hootsuite, Fedilab, or other unified social clients.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface DimensionDev/Flare
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Hootsuite
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Hootsuite · recommended 1×
  2. Buffer · recommended 1×
  3. TweetDeck · recommended 1×
  4. IFTTT · recommended 1×
  5. Zapier · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I combine multiple social media feeds into a single timeline?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hootsuite
    2. Buffer
    3. TweetDeck
    4. IFTTT
    5. Zapier
    6. Walls.io
    7. Taggbox

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named DimensionDev/Flare. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a privacy-focused, open-source client for managing diverse social network accounts.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Fedilab (fedilab/fedilab)
    2. Twidere X (TwidereProject/TwidereX)
    3. Friendly Social Browser
    4. Phoenix for Twitter (Phoenix-for-Twitter/Phoenix)
    5. Barinsta (austinhuang0131/Barinsta)
    6. Slide for Reddit (ccrama/Slide)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named DimensionDev/Flare. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of DimensionDev/Flare?
    pass
    AI named DimensionDev/Flare explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts DimensionDev/Flare in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named DimensionDev/Flare explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo DimensionDev/Flare solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named DimensionDev/Flare explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of DimensionDev/Flare. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/DimensionDev/Flare.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/DimensionDev/Flare)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/DimensionDev/Flare"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/DimensionDev/Flare.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

DimensionDev/Flare — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite