RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

SugarcaneDefender/z-waif

Default branch main · commit 53a17e9c · scanned 6/8/2026, 10:56:39 PM

GitHub: 534 stars · 60 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface SugarcaneDefender/z-waif, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # z-waif
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # z-waif: Your Local, Open-Source AI Waifu & Virtual Companion Creator
  • mediumabout#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a link to a project homepage, documentation, or a demo site.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the existing license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section to the README, perhaps under 'License', that explicitly states the terms of use and any specific licenses that apply to the project, referencing the existing LICENSE file.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface SugarcaneDefender/z-waif
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
VSeeFace
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. VSeeFace · recommended 1×
  2. VRChat · recommended 1×
  3. Python · recommended 1×
  4. ElevenLabs · recommended 1×
  5. Coqui TTS · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build a local AI companion with customizable voice and VTuber model integration?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. VSeeFace
    2. VRChat
    3. Python
    4. ElevenLabs
    5. Coqui TTS
    6. Unity
    7. gRPC
    8. websockets
    9. OpenSeeFace
    10. Pygame
    11. Panda3D
    12. PyOpenGL
    13. Live2D Cubism
    14. VTube Studio
    15. VRoid Studio

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named SugarcaneDefender/z-waif. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for open-source tools to create a self-hosted virtual AI character with conversational abilities.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mycroft AI
    2. Open Assistant
    3. Rhasspy
    4. Rasa
    5. Coqui TTS / Coqui STT
    6. Vosk
    7. Home Assistant

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named SugarcaneDefender/z-waif. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of SugarcaneDefender/z-waif?
    pass
    AI did not name SugarcaneDefender/z-waif — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts SugarcaneDefender/z-waif in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named SugarcaneDefender/z-waif explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo SugarcaneDefender/z-waif solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name SugarcaneDefender/z-waif — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of SugarcaneDefender/z-waif. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/SugarcaneDefender/z-waif.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/SugarcaneDefender/z-waif)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/SugarcaneDefender/z-waif"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/SugarcaneDefender/z-waif.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

SugarcaneDefender/z-waif — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite