RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

lishix520/academic-paper-skills

Default branch main · commit c3255576 · scanned 6/6/2026, 6:37:37 PM

GitHub: 830 stars · 89 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface lishix520/academic-paper-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to clarify the repo's nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A systematic framework for planning and writing philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers using Claude Code. These skills transform your research ideas into submission-ready manuscripts through structured workflows with quality checkpoints.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A systematic framework and methodology for planning and writing academic papers using Claude Code. This repository provides a structured, English-language guide with 'skills' (prompts/workflows) to transform your research ideas into submission-ready manuscripts, rather than being a standalone AI tool or a simple knowledge base.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Refine repository topics to emphasize framework and AI application

    Why:

    CURRENT
    academic-writing, claude-code, philosophy, preprint, research-tools
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    academic-writing, claude-code, philosophy, preprint, research-tools, research-methodology, ai-workflow, research-framework, prompt-engineering
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a relevant project homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant project homepage URL (e.g., a dedicated project page, documentation site, or the GitHub repo URL itself if no external site exists) to the repository's 'About' section.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface lishix520/academic-paper-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  2. GPT-4 · recommended 2×
  3. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  4. Elicit · recommended 1×
  5. Scite.ai · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to use AI to structure and write academic research papers efficiently?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Scite.ai
    3. ChatGPT
    4. GPT-4
    5. OpenAI API/Plus
    6. Semantic Scholar
    7. QuillBot
    8. Grammarly Premium
    9. Paperpal

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named lishix520/academic-paper-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for identifying research gaps and simulating peer review for academic manuscripts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Connected Papers
    2. ResearchRabbit
    3. Scopus
    4. Web of Science
    5. ChatGPT
    6. GPT-4
    7. Semantic Scholar
    8. Perplexity AI
    9. Reviewer Credits
    10. Publons
    11. Mendeley
    12. Zotero

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named lishix520/academic-paper-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of lishix520/academic-paper-skills?
    pass
    AI did not name lishix520/academic-paper-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts lishix520/academic-paper-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named lishix520/academic-paper-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo lishix520/academic-paper-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name lishix520/academic-paper-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of lishix520/academic-paper-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/lishix520/academic-paper-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/lishix520/academic-paper-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/lishix520/academic-paper-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/lishix520/academic-paper-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

lishix520/academic-paper-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite