RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

grinev/opencode-telegram-bot

Default branch main · commit 7599de29 · scanned 6/8/2026, 8:22:19 PM

GitHub: 776 stars · 133 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface grinev/opencode-telegram-bot, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify purpose and counter miscategorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    OpenCode Telegram Bot is a secure Telegram client for OpenCode CLI that runs on your local machine. Run AI coding tasks, monitor progress, switch models, and manage sessions from your phone.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    OpenCode Telegram Bot is a secure Telegram client for managing **AI coding tasks** via the OpenCode CLI, running locally on your machine. It allows you to run, monitor progress, switch models, and manage AI coding sessions directly from your phone, providing a modern remote interface for your local AI development environment.
  • mediumabout#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a link to a project homepage or a dedicated landing page for the bot in the repository's 'About' section.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README, explicitly contrasting `OpenCode Telegram Bot` with general remote access tools (e.g., TeamViewer, SSH) and full remote IDEs (e.g., VS Code Remote, JupyterLab), highlighting its unique focus on chat-based, secure, mobile management of *local AI coding agents*.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface grinev/opencode-telegram-bot
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
TeamViewer
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. TeamViewer · recommended 2×
  2. JupyterLab · recommended 1×
  3. Jupyter Mobile/Jupyter Notebook Viewer · recommended 1×
  4. tqdm · recommended 1×
  5. Google Colaboratory (Colab) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I remotely manage and monitor AI coding tasks from my mobile device?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. JupyterLab
    2. Jupyter Mobile/Jupyter Notebook Viewer
    3. tqdm
    4. Google Colaboratory (Colab)
    5. Visual Studio Code (VS Code)
    6. VNC Viewer
    7. TeamViewer
    8. MLflow Tracking UI
    9. TensorBoard
    10. Flask
    11. Django
    12. Termius
    13. JuiceSSH

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named grinev/opencode-telegram-bot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow secure remote control of local AI coding agents via a chat app?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Tailscale
    2. SSH
    3. VS Code Remote Development
    4. Slack
    5. Discord
    6. Telegram
    7. ngrok
    8. Cloudflare Tunnel
    9. python-telegram-bot
    10. slack_sdk
    11. discord.py
    12. Remotely.io
    13. AnyDesk
    14. TeamViewer
    15. OpenVPN
    16. WireGuard

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named grinev/opencode-telegram-bot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of grinev/opencode-telegram-bot?
    pass
    AI did not name grinev/opencode-telegram-bot — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts grinev/opencode-telegram-bot in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named grinev/opencode-telegram-bot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo grinev/opencode-telegram-bot solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named grinev/opencode-telegram-bot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of grinev/opencode-telegram-bot. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/grinev/opencode-telegram-bot.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/grinev/opencode-telegram-bot)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/grinev/opencode-telegram-bot"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/grinev/opencode-telegram-bot.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

grinev/opencode-telegram-bot — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite