RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

neuml/paperai

Default branch master · commit 310a1948 · scanned 5/21/2026, 7:46:57 PM

GitHub: 1,757 stars · 144 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface neuml/paperai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to emphasize 'ready-to-use application' for researchers

    Why:

    CURRENT
    paperai is an AI application for medical and scientific papers.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Paperai is a **complete AI application** for researchers and scientists, providing an **end-to-end solution** to automate information extraction and summarization from medical and scientific papers using LLM and RAG.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/neuml/paperai
  • lowreadme#3
    Highlight self-hostable and local corpus processing in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a sentence like: 'Unlike cloud-based services, `paperai` is **self-hostable**, allowing you to securely process and analyze **your own local corpus of research papers** with full control over your data.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface neuml/paperai
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI API
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI API · recommended 2×
  2. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  3. explosion/spaCy · recommended 1×
  4. SciBERT · recommended 1×
  5. Google Cloud AI Platform / Vertex AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automate information extraction and summarization from scientific papers using AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers Library (huggingface/transformers)
    2. SpaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    3. OpenAI API
    4. SciBERT
    5. Google Cloud AI Platform / Vertex AI
    6. Amazon Comprehend Medical
    7. Gensim (piskvorky/gensim)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named neuml/paperai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good tools for bulk LLM inference and RAG over research documents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Haystack
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. LangChain
    4. Deepset Cloud
    5. OpenAI API
    6. transformers
    7. sentence-transformers
    8. Pinecone
    9. Weaviate
    10. Qdrant
    11. Chroma
    12. Cohere RAG

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named neuml/paperai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of neuml/paperai?
    pass
    AI did not name neuml/paperai — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts neuml/paperai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named neuml/paperai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo neuml/paperai solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named neuml/paperai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of neuml/paperai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/neuml/paperai.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/neuml/paperai)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/neuml/paperai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/neuml/paperai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

neuml/paperai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite