RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

fancydirty/mediary-scout

Default branch main · commit 7dcf5526 · scanned 7/1/2026, 2:42:34 PM

GitHub: 846 stars · 44 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface fancydirty/mediary-scout, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    media-library, ai-agent, cloud-storage, llm, media-management, self-hosted, 115, quark, guangyapan
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify license status in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Mediary Scout is released under the 0BSD license. See the LICENSE file for details.
  • mediumabout#3
    Refine About description to emphasize LLM agent

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Agent-driven media library for your cloud drives (115 / Quark / 光鸭 GuangYaPan).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    LLM agent-driven media library for your cloud drives (115 / Quark / 光鸭 GuangYaPan).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface fancydirty/mediary-scout
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Hazel
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Hazel · recommended 1×
  2. File Juggler · recommended 1×
  3. FolderMill · recommended 1×
  4. PhotoPrism · recommended 1×
  5. Immich · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automate finding and organizing media files into my cloud storage using an AI agent?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hazel
    2. File Juggler
    3. FolderMill
    4. PhotoPrism
    5. Immich
    6. rclone
    7. Plex
    8. Jellyfin
    9. Zapier
    10. Make

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named fancydirty/mediary-scout. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a self-hosted solution to automatically acquire and organize media on my cloud drives.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Plex Media Server
    2. Plex Pass
    3. Radarr (Radarr/Radarr)
    4. Sonarr (Sonarr/Sonarr)
    5. qBittorrent (qbittorrent/qBittorrent)
    6. Transmission (transmission/transmission)
    7. NZBGet (nzbget/nzbget)
    8. SABnzbd (sabnzbd/sabnzbd)
    9. Jellyfin (jellyfin/jellyfin)
    10. FileBot
    11. TheTVDB
    12. TheMovieDB
    13. AniDB
    14. rclone (rclone/rclone)

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named fancydirty/mediary-scout. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of fancydirty/mediary-scout?
    pass
    AI named fancydirty/mediary-scout explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts fancydirty/mediary-scout in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named fancydirty/mediary-scout explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo fancydirty/mediary-scout solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name fancydirty/mediary-scout — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of fancydirty/mediary-scout. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/fancydirty/mediary-scout.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/fancydirty/mediary-scout)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/fancydirty/mediary-scout"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/fancydirty/mediary-scout.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

fancydirty/mediary-scout — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
fancydirty/mediary-scout — RepoGEO report