RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bozhouDev/codex-orange-book

Default branch main · commit 96e33429 · scanned 6/26/2026, 12:27:50 PM

GitHub: 2,086 stars · 215 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bozhouDev/codex-orange-book, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["AI编程助手", "OpenAI Codex", "代码大模型", "开发者指南", "AI开发工具", "教程", "手册", "编程助手", "代码生成", "AI工具"]
  • highlicense#2
    Add a clear license file and mention it in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a `LICENSE` file to the repository root with the text of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Also, add a line to the README under the '0. 使用说明' or '0.1 重要声明' section: `本指南内容采用 [知识共享署名 4.0 国际许可协议 (CC BY 4.0)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.zh) 进行许可。`
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the repository homepage URL to the '在线阅读' link for the guide (e.g., `https://bozhoudev.github.io/codex-orange-book/online-read` or similar, replacing with the actual URL).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface bozhouDev/codex-orange-book
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  2. Tabnine · recommended 2×
  3. Codeium · recommended 2×
  4. Amazon CodeWhisperer · recommended 1×
  5. Cursor · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a comprehensive guide to install and master an AI coding assistant.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. Codeium
    4. Amazon CodeWhisperer
    5. Cursor
    6. Google Gemini

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named bozhouDev/codex-orange-book. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to integrate an AI development tool with my IDE for code management and automation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. Codeium
    4. DeepCode AI (now part of Snyk Code)
    5. Pylint (pylint-dev/pylint)
    6. ESLint (eslint/eslint)
    7. GitHub Actions

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named bozhouDev/codex-orange-book. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bozhouDev/codex-orange-book?
    pass
    AI named bozhouDev/codex-orange-book explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bozhouDev/codex-orange-book in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bozhouDev/codex-orange-book explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bozhouDev/codex-orange-book solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named bozhouDev/codex-orange-book explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bozhouDev/codex-orange-book. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bozhouDev/codex-orange-book.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bozhouDev/codex-orange-book)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bozhouDev/codex-orange-book"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bozhouDev/codex-orange-book.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bozhouDev/codex-orange-book — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite