RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ComposioHQ/trustclaw

Default branch main · commit c07410bc · scanned 6/7/2026, 10:57:57 AM

GitHub: 811 stars · 187 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ComposioHQ/trustclaw, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    personal-ai-agent, self-hosted, ai-automation, composio-tools, telegram-bot, vector-memory, open-source, ai-security, agentic-ai
  • mediumreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to emphasize self-hosting and personal automation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **Your AI that does things while you sleep. _Securely._**

A 24/7 personal AI assistant with 1000+ tools via **OAuth** and **sandboxed execution**.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **TrustClaw: Your secure, self-hostable AI assistant for personal automation.**

A 24/7 personal AI agent with 1000+ tools via **OAuth** and **sandboxed execution**.
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the official project homepage URL (e.g., a dedicated landing page or documentation site) to the repository settings.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ComposioHQ/trustclaw
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Home Assistant
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Home Assistant · recommended 1×
  2. ESPHome · recommended 1×
  3. Ollama · recommended 1×
  4. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  5. Nabu Casa · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I set up a secure, self-hosted AI assistant for personal automation tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Home Assistant
    2. ESPHome
    3. Ollama
    4. LM Studio
    5. Nabu Casa
    6. WireGuard
    7. OpenVPN
    8. Mycroft AI
    9. Rhasspy
    10. Node-RED
    11. MQTT
    12. Mosquitto
    13. OpenHAB

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named ComposioHQ/trustclaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI agent with extensive tool integrations and persistent memory for daily tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    2. Pinecone
    3. ChromaDB (chroma-core/chroma)
    4. BabyAGI (yoheinakajima/babyagi)
    5. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    6. SuperAGI (SuperAGI/SuperAGI)
    7. CrewAI (joaomdmoura/crewAI)
    8. Microsoft AutoGen (microsoft/autogen)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named ComposioHQ/trustclaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ComposioHQ/trustclaw?
    pass
    AI named ComposioHQ/trustclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ComposioHQ/trustclaw in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ComposioHQ/trustclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ComposioHQ/trustclaw solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ComposioHQ/trustclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ComposioHQ/trustclaw. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ComposioHQ/trustclaw.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ComposioHQ/trustclaw)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ComposioHQ/trustclaw"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ComposioHQ/trustclaw.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ComposioHQ/trustclaw — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite