RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

14790897/paper-ai

Default branch main · commit f5b6b7b4 · scanned 5/30/2026, 9:07:03 AM

GitHub: 1,685 stars · 192 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 14790897/paper-ai, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clearly state the repo's function as an AI paper generator

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1>paper-ai</h1>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1>paper-ai: AI-powered Academic Paper Generator with Real Literature Citations</h1>
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics related to AI academic writing and literature integration

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, paper
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, paper, academic-writing, literature-review, citation-management, research-tool, generative-ai, scholarly-publishing
  • lowreadme#3
    Explicitly state the MIT license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
    This project is licensed under the MIT License.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 14790897/paper-ai
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Scite.ai
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Scite.ai · recommended 2×
  2. Connected Papers · recommended 2×
  3. Paperpile · recommended 2×
  4. Zotero · recommended 2×
  5. Mendeley · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools can help me write academic papers and integrate relevant research literature?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Scite.ai
    3. Connected Papers
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. ChatGPT
    6. QuillBot
    7. Paperpile
    8. Zotero
    9. Mendeley

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named 14790897/paper-ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automate literature review and generate accurate citations for scientific papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Zotero
    2. Mendeley
    3. EndNote
    4. Paperpile
    5. Connected Papers
    6. ResearchRabbit
    7. Scite.ai

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named 14790897/paper-ai. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 14790897/paper-ai?
    pass
    AI named 14790897/paper-ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 14790897/paper-ai in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 14790897/paper-ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 14790897/paper-ai solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named 14790897/paper-ai explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 14790897/paper-ai. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/14790897/paper-ai.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/14790897/paper-ai)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/14790897/paper-ai"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/14790897/paper-ai.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

14790897/paper-ai — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite