RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

editor-js/awesome-editorjs

Default branch master · commit 7453310e · scanned 5/27/2026, 10:47:38 PM

GitHub: 2,844 stars · 227 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface editor-js/awesome-editorjs, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add explicit clarification to README's opening description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > A curated list of awesome Editor.js tools, libraries and resources.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    > This is the definitive curated list of community-contributed tools, libraries, and resources for developers building with Editor.js. It serves as a comprehensive guide to extend and enhance your Editor.js implementation, *distinct from the core Editor.js project itself*.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to reinforce repo's role as a resource list

    Why:

    CURRENT
    awesome, awesome-list, editorjs, libraries, tools
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome, awesome-list, editorjs, editorjs-plugins, editorjs-tools, block-editor-resources, content-editor-extensions, community-resources, javascript-libraries

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface editor-js/awesome-editorjs
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
facebook/lexical
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. facebook/lexical · recommended 2×
  2. codex-team/editor.js · recommended 2×
  3. ueberdosis/tiptap · recommended 2×
  4. WordPress/gutenberg · recommended 1×
  5. ProseMirror/prosemirror · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good options for extending a block-based content editor with custom tools?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gutenberg (WordPress/gutenberg)
    2. Lexical (facebook/lexical)
    3. ProseMirror (ProseMirror/prosemirror)
    4. Block.js
    5. Editor.js (codex-team/editor.js)
    6. Tiptap (ueberdosis/tiptap)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named editor-js/awesome-editorjs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate a flexible block editor into my web application using various frameworks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. BlockSuite (liveblocks/blocksuite)
    2. Lexical (facebook/lexical)
    3. TipTap (ueberdosis/tiptap)
    4. Editor.js (codex-team/editor.js)
    5. ProseMirror (prosemirror/prosemirror)
    6. Quill (quilljs/quill)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named editor-js/awesome-editorjs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of editor-js/awesome-editorjs?
    pass
    AI did not name editor-js/awesome-editorjs — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts editor-js/awesome-editorjs in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named editor-js/awesome-editorjs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo editor-js/awesome-editorjs solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name editor-js/awesome-editorjs — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of editor-js/awesome-editorjs. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/editor-js/awesome-editorjs.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/editor-js/awesome-editorjs)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/editor-js/awesome-editorjs"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/editor-js/awesome-editorjs.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

editor-js/awesome-editorjs — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
editor-js/awesome-editorjs — RepoGEO report